The Wilted Rose

Charting Labour meltdown 2007-2010

Labour’s employment shame

Focus on Birmingham

Recently, we have heard much of the possible Lloyds TSB/HBOS job losses of up to 40,000 as well as the shedding of 4,500 Lehman Brothers jobs in the City.  However, what about elsewhere?  What is going on to the local economies – where most of us live – in terms of unemployment and worklessness?

Nationally, we know from the Office of National Statistics that:

The unemployment rate was 5.5 per cent for the three months to July 2008, up 0.2 over both the previous quarter and over the year. The number of unemployed people increased by 81,000 over the quarter and by 72,000 over the year, to reach 1.72 million.

But Labour has presided over an increase of unemployment in the entrepreneurial city of Birmingham again (this is of personal interest to me as I worked there for over three years).  The birthplace of the industrial revolution is suffering from Brownian economic policy with an unemployment rate of 9.2%.

          Source: ONS (2008)

The ONS report also finds that economic inactivity in Birmingham is a staggering 30.7% much higher than the UK’s corresponding 21.6% rate.

Even more of an indictment for Labour – which is supposed to be the party of ethnic minorities – is that in Birmingham the employment rate for non-white adults is only 50.6% (63.1% for the whole population) and their economic inactivity rate is 41.9% (compared to 30.7% overall). 

So if you’re black or Pakistani and living in Birmingham – or anywhere else in the UK – you can blame Labour for your economic situation.

And no matter what colour, gender or age you are, if you live in Birmingham, you’re much more likely to be out of work than if you live in many other parts of the country. 

The next Government needs to sort this mess out and get people, whatever their ‘demographics’ or background, back into work.

Advertisements

18 September, 2008 - Posted by | economy, Gordon Brown, Labour Party, politics, shame | , ,

3 Comments »

  1. A good start would be to define what ‘unemployed’ counts as. In my view, it should be all those that are not working and are not in full-time education. That must include the 2.5m disabled people, once they have determined who could do some work and who simply could not. There is no point in kidding ourselves by massaging the numbers.

    Comment by UK Voter | 19 September, 2008 | Reply

  2. Shouldn’t that read ‘a Tory council has presided over an increase of unemployment in the entrepreneurial city of Birmingham’?

    Comment by dp | 19 September, 2008 | Reply

  3. […] £300-million of taxpayers money on free laptops+broadband for 7-19 year-olds whose parents are on the dole… “It’s not about the access […] I chatted with Nick Booth last night about the […]

    Pingback by D’log :: blogging since 2000 » Free laptops | 24 September, 2008 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: